Rubric

Keep in mind that 33 students have already been assessed using this rubric. Changing it will affect their evaluations.
CAD Rubric CW&R
CAD Rubric CW&R
Criteria Ratings Pts
Argument
How effective was the thesis in describing the purpose of the assignment
threshold: pts
25 pts Excellent Essay contains a clear argument—i.e., lets the reader know exactly what the author is trying to communicate.
15 pts Good An argument is present, but reader must reconstruct it from the text.
10 pts Needs Improvement Author attempts, but fails, to make an argument (e.g., starts with a rhetorical question/statement or anecdote that is never put into context).
5 pts Poor No attempt is made to articulate an argument.
0 pts Failure
pts
25 pts
--
Evidence
How was the information of the paper used
threshold: pts
15 pts Excellent Provides compelling and accurate evidence that convinces reader to accept main argument. The importance/relevance of all pieces of evidence is clearly stated. There are no gaps in reasoning—i.e., the reader does not need to assume anything or do additional research to accept main argument.
9 pts Good Provides necessary evidence to convince reader of most aspects of the main argument but not all. The importance/ relevance of some evidence presented may not be totally clear. Reader must make a few mental leaps or do some additional research to fully accept all aspects of main argument.
6 pts Need Improvement Not enough evidence is provided to support author’s argument, or evidence is incomplete, incorrect, or oversimplified. Information from lectures and readings is not effectively used.
3 pts Poor Either no evidence is provided, or there are numerous factual mistakes, omissions or oversimplifications. There is little or no mention of information from lectures and readings.
0 pts Failure
pts
15 pts
--
Counter-Evidence
What are potential weaknesses in the argument, and how are these issues addressed.
threshold: pts
10 pts Excellent The author considers the evidence, or alternate interpretations of evidence, that could be used to refute or weaken his/her argument, and thoughtfully responds to it.
6 pts Good Author acknowledges that counter-evidence or alternative interpretations exists, and lists them fully, but does not effectively explain to reader why his/her argument still stands.
4 pts Needs Improvement Author acknowledges some of the most obvious counter-evidence and alternative explanations, but is not comprehensive in this task. There is little or no attempt made to respond to them.
2 pts Poor No acknowledgment of counter-evidence or alternative interpretations.
0 pts Failure
pts
10 pts
--
Sources
What kind of information was selected for the assignment
threshold: pts
10 pts Excellent Evidence is used from a wide range of sources, including lectures and course readings. When required, author also consults scholarly books, websites, journal articles, etc. not explicitly discussed in class.
6 pts Good Evidence is used from many sources, but author relies heavily on a more limited set of sources. Some effort is made to go beyond material presented in class when required, but not much. If outside sources are used, they are primarily non-scholarly (i.e., intended for a general audience) and/or web-based.
4 pts Needs Improvement Uses only a few of the sources provided in class, or does not go beyond what has been provided by professor when required to do additional research.
2 pts Poor Does not use sources, only minimally uses sources provided by instructor, or relies exclusively on non-scholarly outside sources.
0 pts Failure
pts
10 pts
--
Citations
Did you follow the Citation Format correctly
Long Scale Papers use Chicago Manual of Style
Short Scale papers used (Last Name, Page Number) when noted in the assignment sheet.
threshold: pts
10 pts Excellent All evidence is properly cited in footnotes or endnotes or (Last Name, Page Number) if noted.
6 pts Good All evidence is cited, but there are some minor problems with completeness or format of some citations.
4 pts Needs Improvement Some pieces are unreferenced or inaccurately referenced, and there are problems with completeness and format of citations.
2 pts Poor No attempt is made to cite evidence.
0 pts Failure
pts
10 pts
--
Organization
How is the use of paragraphs aiding the flow of information and supporting the argument
threshold: pts
15 pts Excellent Essay contains an intro, main body, and conclusion. Introduction lays out main argument and gives an outline of what the reader can expect in the essay. The conclusion brings everything together, acknowledges potential shortcomings of the paper, and gives the reader a sense of what further work might be done to advance the subject matter described in the paper.
9 pts Good Essay contains an intro, main body, and conclusion. The introduction lays out the main argument but gives the reader little idea of what to expect in the essay. The conclusion nicely summarizes the main argument and evidence, but does not move beyond what has already been presented in the paper.
6 pts Needs Improvement Essay contains an intro, main body, and conclusion. The introduction gives the reader an idea of what to expect in the paper, but does not effectively lay out the main argument. It may begin with a set of rhetorical questions, or an anecdote that is never fully explained. The conclusion does little more than restate the problematic introduction. Intro and/or conclusion may be too wordy or short.
3 pts Failure Essay has no clear organizational pattern.
0 pts Failure
pts
15 pts
--
Clarity and Style
Considerations to Grammar, Spelling, Wordplay
threshold: pts
15 pts Excellent All sentences are grammatically correct and clearly written. No words are misused or unnecessarily fancy. Technical terms, words from other languages, and words from other historical periods are always explained. All information is accurate and up-to-date. Paper has been spell-checked AND proofread (ideally by you and somebody else), and contains no errors.
9 pts Good All sentences are grammatically correct and clearly written. An occasional word is misused or unnecessarily fancy. Technical terms, words from other languages, and words from other historical periods are usually, but not always, explained. All information is accurate and up-to-date. Paper has been spell-checked AND proofread, and contains no more than a few minor errors, which do not adversely affect the reader’s ability to understand the essay.
6 pts Needs Improvement A few sentences are grammatically incorrect or not clearly written. Several words are misused. Technical terms, words from other languages, and words from other historical periods are rarely explained. Not all information is accurate and up-to-date. Paper has been spell-checked AND proofread, but still contains several errors. Reader’s ability to understand essay may be compromised by these errors.
3 pts Poor Paper is full of grammatical errors and bad writing. Several words are misused. Technical terms, words from other languages, and words from other historical periods are rarely explained. Not all information is accurate and up-to-date. Paper has not been spell-checked or proofread, and contains numerous errors. Reader has a difficult time understanding essay because of errors.
0 pts Failure
pts
15 pts
--